Virtual labs for the study of enzymatic stirred tank bioreactors

Virtual laboratories have successfully proven to be very versatile and intuitive when simulating experiments in science, biotechnology, and engineering. These tools must complement the experiments carried out in real labs or pilot plants. This study describes the creation of a virtual laboratory through the Easy JavaScript Simulation platform. A web‐based simulation of an enzymatic stirred‐tank bioreactor has been built using a dynamic model. This simulation reproduces the behavior of a continuous bioreactor, including the deviations of ideal mixing conditions as by the use of an in tanks‐in‐series model for nonideal flow. This article describes the continuous dynamic model in a stirred tank bioreactor, as well as the operation of a tool capable of carrying out virtual practice with students. Practice scripts have been developed that should be used by students during the practical classes. This interactive tool is powerful and useful to develop many experiments by varying the different input parameters, saving time and resources. In addition, the tool allows following teaching sessions in specific situations such as the health situation derived from the pandemic caused by COVID‐19.

Impact of COVID-19 on Short- and Medium-Term Prescription of Enteral Nutrition in the General Population vs. Older People in the Community of Madrid, Spain.

We aimed to analyse the impact of COVID-19 during 2020 and 2021 on the prescription of enteral nutritional support and its expenditure in the Community of Madrid, Spain, compared to pre-pandemic data from 2016 in the general population vs. elderly. We analysed official electronic prescriptions of all public hospitals of the Community of Madrid. The population over 75 years of age have the higher prescription of nutritional supplements (p < 0.001 vs. other age groups), with no differences between the 45-64 age group compared to the 65-74 age group (χ2 = 3.259, p = 0.196). The first wave of COVID-19 or the first time there was a real awareness of the virus in Spain is similar in a way to the first peak of prescription of enteral nutrition in March 2020. The second peak of prescription was observed in the over 75 age group in July 2020, being more pronounced in December 2020 and March-April of the following year (F = 7.863, p = 0.041). The last peaks correspond to summer 2021 and autumn of the same year (p = 0.031-year 2021 vs. 2020, p = 0.011-year 2021 vs. 2019), where a relationship between increased prescription of enteral nutrition and COVID-19 cases is observed. High-protein and high-calorie dietary therapies were the most prescribed in patients with or without diabetes. All of this entailed higher cost for the Community of Madrid. In conclusion, COVID-19 significantly affected the prescription of nutritional support, especially in the population over 75 years of age.

Caracterización clínica, según niveles de glucemia, de pacientes hospitalizados por COVID-19: serie de casos

Hyperglycemia, with or without diabetes, is associated with complications in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. There is no informa- tion regarding this problem in our region. This study was aimed to compare the characteristics and in-hospital clinical course of patients with a probable diagnosis of COVID-19, with and without hyperglycemia during the hospital- ization. This is a retrospective, observational study of clinical records review of hospitalized patients with COVID-19. The ISARIC-WHO form was used for data collection. Hyperglycemia was defined as a fasting value 140 mg/dL ac- cording to standard glycaemia targets in hospitalized patients. A total of 148 patients were included, 97 (65.5%) men and 51 (34.5%) women, with a mean age of 64.1..16.1 years;of which 42/148 (28.4%) patients reported previous diabetes, 60/148 (40.5%) patients had hyperglycemia during the hospitaliza- tion and 32/60 (53.3%) of these cases did not report previous diabetes. The patients with hyperglycemia were older, received more frequently systemic cor- ticosteroids (96.6 vs 82.6%;p=0.01), and antibiotics (68.3 vs 44.3%;p=0.01), had worse baseline oxygenation parameters (SpO 2 88.1..11.7%;vs 92.8..5.5%;p=0.02, PaO 2 /FiO 2, 194.4..119.7 vs 270.9..118.3;p<0.001), higher total lung severity score in the chest CT (14.9..5.7 vs 11.1..6.3;p<0.001) and higher lev- els of baseline inflammatory markers (CRP 6.73..3.61 vs 5.08..4.21;p<0.01, LDH 342.9..118.4 vs 296.5..161.4;p=0.01 and Ferritin 687.7..373.2 vs 542.6..395.3;p=0.01). Mortality (34.5 vs 10.7%;p<0.001) and admission to ICU (43.3 vs 7.9%;p<0.001) were higher in patients with hyperglycemia. Hyperglycemia in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 is a marker of seve- re disease and poor prognosis.

[Effectiveness of glucocorticoids in patients hospitalized for severe SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia]. / Efectividad de los glucocorticoides en pacientes hospitalizados por neumonía grave por SARS-CoV-2.

INTRODUCTION: Several studies have reported the beneficial effect of glucocorticoids in the treatment of cytokine storm that occurs in patients with severe COVID-19. Various glucocorticoids regimens have been proposed. METHODS: Retrospective observational study that includes patients with severe SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia and compares admission to an Intensive Care Unit (ICU) or death during hospitalization in three groups of patients: no glucocorticoids treatment, use of glucocorticoids doses equivalent to less than 250mg of prednisone daily and use of equivalent doses greater than or equal to 250mg of prednisone daily. Multivariate analysis was performed using logistic regression, using the propensity index as a covariant. RESULTS: Of the 259 patients enrolled in the study, 67 (25.9%) had an unfavorable evolution, dying or requiring ICU admission. Comparative analyzes between different glucocorticoids treatments and the association with ICU admission or death were: glucocorticoids treatment (any dose) versus no glucocorticoids treatment (OR: 0.71 [0.30-1.66]), treatment with glucocorticoids (≥250mg prednisone daily) versus no glucocorticoids treatment (OR: 0.35 [0.11-1.08]) and glucocorticoids treatment (≥250mg prednisone daily) versus patients with glucocorticoids doses <250mg prednisone daily or without glucocorticoids treatment (OR: 0.30 [0.10-0.88]). CONCLUSION: The results of this study show that patients with severe SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia treated with glucocorticoids pulses with equivalent doses of prednisone greater than or equal to 250mg have a more favorable evolution (less mortality and less admission to ICU).

A Multicenter Analysis of the Outcome of Cancer Patients with Neutropenia and COVID-19 Optionally Treated with Granulocyte-Colony Stimulating Factor (G-CSF): A Comparative Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Approximately 15% of patients infected by SARS-CoV-2 develop a distress syndrome secondary to a host hyperinflammatory response induced by a cytokine storm. Myelosuppression is associated with a higher risk of infections and mortality. There are data to support methods of management for neutropenia and COVID-19. We present a multicenter experience during the first COVID-19 outbreak in neutropenic cancer patients infected by SARS-CoV-2. METHODS: Clinical retrospective data were collected from neutropenic cancer patients with COVID-19. Comorbidities, tumor type, stage, treatment, neutropenia severity, G-CSF, COVID-19 parameters, and mortality were analyzed. A bivariate analysis of the impact on mortality was carried out. Additionally, we performed a multivariable logistic regression to predict respiratory failure and death. RESULTS: Among the 943 cancer patients screened, 83 patients (11.3%) simultaneously had neutropenia and an infection with COVID-19. The lungs (26%) and breasts (22%) were the primary locations affected, and most patients had advanced disease (67%). In the logistic model, as adjusted covariates, sex, age, treatment (palliative vs. curative), tumor type, and the lowest level of neutrophils were used. A significant effect was obtained for the number of days of G-CSF treatment (OR = 1.4, 95% CI [1,1,03,92], p-value = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that a prolonged G-CSF treatment could be disadvantageous for these cancer patients with infections by COVID-19, with a higher probability of worse outcome.

Environmental Fe, Ti, Al, Cu, Hg, Bi, and Si Nanoparticles in the Atrioventricular Conduction Axis and the Associated Ultrastructural Damage in Young Urbanites: Cardiac Arrhythmias Caused by Anthropogenic, Industrial, E-Waste, and Indoor Nanoparticles.

Air pollution exposure is a risk factor for arrhythmia. The atrioventricular (AV) conduction axis is key for the passage of electrical signals to ventricles. We investigated whether environmental nanoparticles (NPs) reach the AV axis and whether they are associated with ultrastructural cell damage. Here, we demonstrate the detection of the shape, size, and composition of NPs by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and energy-dispersive X-ray spectrometry (EDX) in 10 subjects from Metropolitan Mexico City (MMC) with a mean age of 25.3 ± 5.9 and a 71-year-old subject without cardiac pathology. We found that in every case, Fe, Ti, Al, Hg, Cu, Bi, and/or Si spherical or acicular NPs with a mean size of 36 ± 17 nm were present in the AV axis in situ, freely and as conglomerates, within the mitochondria, sarcomeres, lysosomes, lipofuscin, and/or intercalated disks and gap junctions of Purkinje and transitional cells, telocytes, macrophages, endothelium, and adjacent atrial and ventricular fibers. Erythrocytes were found to transfer NPs to the endothelium. Purkinje fibers with increased lysosomal activity and totally disordered myofilaments and fragmented Z-disks exhibited NP conglomerates in association with gap junctions and intercalated disks. AV conduction axis pathology caused by environmental NPs is a plausible and modifiable risk factor for understanding common arrhythmias and reentrant tachycardia. Anthropogenic, industrial, e-waste, and indoor NPs reach pacemaker regions, thereby increasing potential mechanisms that disrupt the electrical impulse pathways of the heart. The cardiotoxic, oxidative, and abnormal electric performance effects of NPs in pacemaker locations warrant extensive research. Cardiac arrhythmias associated with nanoparticle effects could be preventable.

Effectiveness of glucocorticoids in patients hospitalized for severe SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia.

BACKGROUND: Several studies have reported the beneficial effect of glucocorticoids in the treatment of cytokine storm that occurs in patients with severe COVID-19. Various glucocorticoids regimens have been proposed. METHODS: Retrospective observational study that includes patients with severe SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia and compares admission to an Intensive Care Unit (ICU) or death during hospitalization in three groups of patients: no glucocorticoids treatment, use of glucocorticoids doses equivalent to less than 250 mg of prednisone daily and use of equivalent doses greater than or equal to 250 mg of prednisone daily. Multivariate analysis was performed using logistic regression, using the propensity index as a covariant. RESULTS: Of the 259 patients enrolled in the study, 67 (25.9%) had an unfavorable evolution, dying or requiring ICU admission. Comparative analyzes between different glucocorticoids treatments and the association with ICU admission or death were: glucocorticoids treatment (any dose) versus no glucocorticoids treatment (OR: 0.71 [0.30-1.66]), treatment with glucocorticoids (≥250 mg prednisone daily) versus no glucocorticoids treatment (OR: 0.35 [0.11-1.08]) and glucocorticoids treatment (≥250 mg prednisone daily) versus patients with glucocorticoids doses <250 mg prednisone daily or without glucocorticoids treatment (OR: 0.30 [0.10-0.88]). CONCLUSION: The results of this study show that patients with severe SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia treated with glucocorticoids pulses with equivalent doses of prednisone greater than or equal to 250 mg have a more favorable evolution (less mortality and less admission to ICU).

INTRODUCCIÓN: Se han comunicado varios trabajos donde se ha demostrado un efecto beneficioso de los glucocorticoides como tratamiento de la tormenta de citocinas que se asocia a los cuadros graves por SARS-CoV-2, plateándose diferentes pautas de glucocorticoides. MÉTODOS: Estudio observacional retrospectivo que incluye pacientes con neumonía grave por SARS-CoV-2 y compara el ingreso en una unidad de cuidados intensivos (UCI) o fallecimiento durante la hospitalización en 3 grupos de pacientes: sin tratamiento con glucocorticoides, uso de dosis diarias de glucocorticoides equivalentes menores a 250 mg de prednisona y dosis diarias equivalentes mayores o iguales a 250 mg de prednisona. Se realizó un análisis multivariante mediante regresión logística, utilizando el índice de propensión como covariante. RESULTADOS: De los 259 pacientes incorporados al estudio 67 (25,9%) tuvieron una evolución desfavorable, falleciendo o precisando ingreso en UCI. Los análisis comparativos entre diferentes tratamientos con glucocorticoides, y la asociación con ingreso en UCI o fallecimiento fueron: tratamiento con glucocorticoides (cualquier dosis) versus sin tratamiento con glucocorticoides (OR: 0,71 [0,30­1,66]), tratamiento con glucocorticoides (≥250 mg de prednisona al día) versus sin tratamiento con glucocorticoides (OR: 0,35 [0,11­1,08]) y tratamiento con glucocorticoides (≥250 mg de prednisona al día) versus pacientes con dosis de glucocorticoides < 250 mg de prednisona o sin tratamiento con glucocorticoides (OR: 0,30 [0,10­0,88]). CONCLUSIÓN: Los resultados de este estudio muestran que los paciente con neumonía grave por SARS-CoV-2 tratados con pulsos con glucocorticoides con dosis equivalentes de prednisona mayor o igual de 250 mg tienen una evolución más favorable (menos mortalidad e ingreso en UCI).

Risk factors and outcome of COVID-19 in patients with hematological malignancies.

BACKGROUND: Prognostic factors of poor outcome in patients with hematological malignancies and COVID-19 are poorly defined. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a Spanish transplant group and cell therapy (GETH) multicenter retrospective observational study, which included a large cohort of blood cancer patients with laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection through PCR assays from March 1st 2020 to May 15th 2020. RESULTS: We included 367 pediatric and adult patients with hematological malignancies, including recipients of autologous (ASCT) (n = 58) or allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) (n = 65) from 41 hospitals in Spain. Median age of patients was 64 years (range 1-93.8). Recipients of ASCT and allo-SCT showed lower mortality rates (17% and 18%, respectively) compared to non-SCT patients (31%) (p = 0.02). Prognostic factors identified for day 45 overall mortality (OM) by logistic regression multivariate analysis included age > 70 years [odds ratio (OR) 2.1, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.2-3.8, p = 0.011]; uncontrolled hematological malignancy (OR 2.9, 95% CI 1.6-5.2, p < 0.0001); ECOG 3-4 (OR, 2.56, 95% CI 1.4-4.7, p = 0.003); neutropenia (< 0.5 × 109/L) (OR 2.8, 95% CI 1.3-6.1, p = 0.01); and a C-reactive protein (CRP) > 20 mg/dL (OR 3.3, 95% CI 1.7-6.4, p < 0.0001). In multivariate analysis of 216 patients with very severe COVID-19, treatment with azithromycin or low dose corticosteroids was associated with lower OM (OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.2-0.89 and OR 0.31, 95% CI 0.11-0.87, respectively, p = 0.02) whereas the use of hidroxycloroquine did not show significant improvement in OM (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.37-1.1, P = 0.1). CONCLUSIONS: In most patients with hematological malignancies COVID-19 mortality was directly driven by older age, disease status, performance status, as well as by immune (neutropenia) parameters and level of inflammation (high CRP). Use of azithromycin and low dose corticosteroids may be of value in very severe COVID-19.